Erik Bulten

1.1k total citations
33 papers, 657 citations indexed

About

Erik Bulten is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Erik Bulten has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 657 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Clinical Psychology, 12 papers in Social Psychology and 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Erik Bulten's work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (19 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (5 papers). Erik Bulten is often cited by papers focused on Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (19 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (5 papers). Erik Bulten collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Erik Bulten's co-authors include Henk Nijman, Cees van der Staak, Birgit Vӧllm, Danique Smeijers, Robbert‐Jan Verkes, Inti A. Brazil, Stephanie Sampson, Janusz Heitzman, Allan Seppänen and Paweł Gosek and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Clinical Psychology Review and Cortex.

In The Last Decade

Erik Bulten

31 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers

Erik Bulten

SPS

PMH

Najat Khalifa United Kingdom

Sadia R. Chaudhury United States

Alberto Fernández-Liria Spain

Philippe Jeammet France

Lars O. White Germany

Philippe Stéphan Switzerland

Megan Chesin United States

Marc J. Weintraub United States

Matilda E. Nowakowski Canada

Steven E. Bailley United States

Najat Khalifa United Kingdom

Erik Bulten

387 ×0.8

122 ×0.7

SPS

158 ×1.0

PMH

139 ×0.9

123 ×2.2

Citations per year, relative to Erik Bulten Erik Bulten (= 1×) peers Najat Khalifa

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Bulten

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Bulten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Bulten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Bulten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Bulten

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Bulten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Bulten. The network helps show where Erik Bulten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Erik Bulten

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Erik Bulten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Erik Bulten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Erik Bulten. Erik Bulten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Maes, Joseph H. R., et al.. (2022). So what'cha want? The impact of individualised rewards on associative learning in psychopathic offenders. Cortex. 149. 44–58. 5 indexed citations

Hutsebaut, Joost, et al.. (2021). Assessment of ICD-11 Personality Disorder Severity in Forensic Patients Using the Semi-structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1): Preliminary Findings. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 12. 617702–617702. 16 indexed citations

Tuente, Stéphanie Klein, Stefan Bogaerts, Erik Bulten, et al.. (2020). Virtual Reality Aggression Prevention Therapy (VRAPT) versus Waiting List Control for Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 9(7). 2258–2258. 54 indexed citations

Bulten, Erik, et al.. (2020). A Comparison of English and Dutch Long-Stay Patients in Forensic Psychiatric Care. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 11. 574247–574247. 9 indexed citations

Bulten, Erik, et al.. (2019). Changes in subjective wellbeing of prisoners on remand. International Journal of Prisoner Health. 15(2). 181–191. 10 indexed citations

Smeijers, Danique, Erik Bulten, & Inti A. Brazil. (2019). The Computations of hostile biases (CHB) model: Grounding hostility biases in a unified cognitive framework. Clinical Psychology Review. 73. 101775–101775. 26 indexed citations

Vӧllm, Birgit, Martin Clarke, Allan Seppänen, et al.. (2018). European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry: Evidence based assessment and treatment of mentally disordered offenders. European Psychiatry. 51. 58–73. 72 indexed citations

Smeijers, Danique, et al.. (2018). Lack of correspondence between the reactive proactive questionnaire and the impulsive premeditated aggression scale among forensic psychiatric outpatients. Aggressive Behavior. 44(5). 471–480. 14 indexed citations

Smeijers, Danique, Erik Bulten, Barbara Franke, Jan K. Buitelaar, & Robbert‐Jan Verkes. (2017). Associations of multiple trauma types and MAOA with severe aggressive behavior and MAOA effects on training outcome. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 30. 66–74. 6 indexed citations

10.

Smeijers, Danique, et al.. (2017). Generalized hostile interpretation bias regarding facial expressions: Characteristic of pathological aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior. 43(4). 386–397. 39 indexed citations

11.

Sampson, Stephanie, et al.. (2016). Long-Term Forensic Mental Health Services: An Exploratory Comparison of 18 European Countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 15(4). 333–351. 48 indexed citations

12.

Verkes, Robbert J., et al.. (2013). Substance use disorders in forensic psychiatric patients. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 37(2). 155–159. 14 indexed citations

13.

Bulten, Erik, et al.. (2012). Assessing Aggressive Behavior in Forensic Psychiatric Patients: Validity and Clinical Utility of Combining Two Instruments. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 26(6). 487–494. 25 indexed citations

14.

Bulten, Erik, et al.. (2009). Demographic and Personality Characteristics of Internet Child Pornography Downloaders in Comparison to Other Offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. 18(6). 611–622. 21 indexed citations

15.

Bulten, Erik, Henk Nijman, & Cees van der Staak. (2009). Psychological Predictors of Help Needs in Male Dutch Prisoners. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health. 8(2). 71–80. 2 indexed citations

16.

Bulten, Erik, Henk Nijman, & Cees van der Staak. (2009). Psychiatric disorders and personality characteristics of prisoners at regular prison wards. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 32(2). 115–119. 55 indexed citations

17.

Nijman, Henk, et al.. (2009). Effects of nutritional supplements on aggression, rule‐breaking, and psychopathology among young adult prisoners. Aggressive Behavior. 36(2). 117–126. 103 indexed citations

18.

Hornsveld, Ruud H. J., et al.. (2008). Violent forensic psychiatric inpatients and violent detainees in the Netherlands. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology. 19(3). 407–419. 2 indexed citations

19.

Bulten, Erik, Henk Nijman, & Cees van der Staak. (2008). Measuring criminal thinking styles: The construct validity and utility of the PICTS in a Dutch prison sample. Legal and Criminological Psychology. 14(1). 35–49. 25 indexed citations

20.

Bulten, Erik, et al.. (2008). A Theoretical Framework for Goal‐directed Care within the Prison System. Mental Health Review Journal. 13(3). 40–50. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact