Naomi Arbit
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
-
- Culinary Culture and Tourism
Papers in
-
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 4
-
- Culinary Culture and Tourism 4
- Co-authors
- Paul Rozin (9 shared papers)Matthew B. Ruby (9 shared papers)Harald T. Schupp (7 shared papers)Britta Renner (7 shared papers)Gudrun Sproesser (7 shared papers)Sumio Imada (3 shared papers)Claude Fischler (3 shared papers)Martha Kaufer‐Horwitz (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Food Quality and Preference (2 papers)Nutrients (1 paper)Food Research International (1 paper)Public Health Nutrition (1 paper)Psychology and Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Naomi Arbit
8 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Applied Psychology 34
- Food Science 67
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
- Marketing 23
- Clinical Psychology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Arbit
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Arbit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Arbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Arbit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Arbit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Arbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Arbit. The network helps show where Naomi Arbit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Naomi Arbit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 34 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 16 | |
| 8 | The eating motivation survey in three countries: results from the USA, India, and Germany | 2016 | 2 |
| 9 | 2017 | 0 |
About Naomi Arbit
Naomi Arbit is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Food Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Culinary Culture and Tourism (4 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (34 citations), Food Science (67 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (95 citations), Marketing (23 citations) and Clinical Psychology (48 citations). Naomi Arbit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Paul Rozin, Matthew B. Ruby, Harald T. Schupp, Britta Renner, Gudrun Sproesser, Sumio Imada, Claude Fischler, Martha Kaufer‐Horwitz, Charity S. Akotia and Gülbanu Kaptan. Their work appears in journals such as Food Quality and Preference, Nutrients, Food Research International, Public Health Nutrition and Psychology and Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.