Nadia Ali

747 citations
73 papers · 433 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research 11
    • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments 4
    • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 7
    • BRCA gene mutations in cancer 6

Nadia Ali

57 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Nadia Ali
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Physiology 169
  • Rheumatology 78
  • Clinical Biochemistry 31
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 61
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 52
Replace Leontine W. ten Hoopen with:
Leontine W. ten Hoopen Netherlands
M. J. Valstar Netherlands
Ellen Leschek United States
Christina A. Castellani Canada
Xuejiao Chen China
Sarah J. Goodman Canada
Anna Verri Italy
Emanuela Zagni Italy
Michela Traglia Italy
Suyash Prasad United States
Nadia Ali relative to Leontine W. ten Hoopen Netherlands Leontine W. ten Hoopen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Leontine W. ten Hoopen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Ali

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Ali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Ali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Ali more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Ali

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Ali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Ali. The network helps show where Nadia Ali may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Ali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Ali Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Ali links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199738
2 201831
3 201324
4 201623
5 200923
6 201623
7 201722
8 201417
9 201816
10 201514
11 202114
12 201510
13 20159
14 20219
15 20209
16 20159
17 20228
18 20198
19 20198
20 20188

About Nadia Ali

Nadia Ali is a scholar working on Physiology, Genetics, Clinical Psychology, Rheumatology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 73 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (11 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers), Glycogen Storage Diseases and Myoclonus (8 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (7 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (4 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (169 citations), Rheumatology (78 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (31 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (61 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (52 citations). Nadia Ali has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Tunisia and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Emily C. Lisi, Cynthia R. Cimino, Dawn A. Laney, Scott Gillespie, Stephanie Cagle, Samir Belal, John D. Coates, Karrie A. Weber, Cecelia Bellcross and Saloua Mrabet. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, Journal of Neural Transmission, Epilepsy & Behavior, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics and Neuropsychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact