Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

5.3k papers and 127.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.3k papers published in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism in the last decades have received a total of 127.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism usually cover Molecular Biology (2.5k papers), Physiology (2.3k papers) and Clinical Biochemistry (1.5k papers) specifically the topics of Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (1.8k papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1.5k papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (655 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism are Mark Lucock, Ellen Sidransky, Nenad Blau, Edward R.B. McCabe, Fernando Scaglia, Nahid Tayebi, James M. Wilson, Mark A. Batzer, Prescott L. Deininger and Ayman W. El‐Hattab.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism.

Countries where authors publish in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Molecular Genetics and Metabolism with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molecular Genetics and Metabolism more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025