Cecelia Bellcross

990 total citations
41 papers, 692 citations indexed

About

Cecelia Bellcross is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Cecelia Bellcross has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 692 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Genetics, 8 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 8 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Cecelia Bellcross's work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (27 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (11 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (8 papers). Cecelia Bellcross is often cited by papers focused on BRCA gene mutations in cancer (27 papers), Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (11 papers) and Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (8 papers). Cecelia Bellcross collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Italy. Cecelia Bellcross's co-authors include Michele Reyes, Muin J. Khoury, Ralph J. Coates, Katherine Kolor, Katrina A.B. Goddard, Lucy A. Peipins, Steven Leadbetter, Sharon Hensley Alford, Dana Meaney‐Delman and Amy A. Lemke and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, American Journal of Public Health and American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Cecelia Bellcross

40 papers receiving 652 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cecelia Bellcross United States 12 496 203 195 141 112 41 692
Bronson D. Riley United States 7 426 0.9× 213 1.0× 155 0.8× 114 0.8× 74 0.7× 8 604
Gord Glendon Canada 12 435 0.9× 100 0.5× 203 1.0× 131 0.9× 70 0.6× 20 608
Lisa R. Susswein United States 15 575 1.2× 331 1.6× 192 1.0× 249 1.8× 150 1.3× 25 913
Andrea Forman United States 17 543 1.1× 111 0.5× 142 0.7× 150 1.1× 172 1.5× 28 732
Susan Tinley United States 13 490 1.0× 329 1.6× 240 1.2× 112 0.8× 82 0.7× 35 824
Vickie L. Venne United States 15 536 1.1× 107 0.5× 196 1.0× 135 1.0× 138 1.2× 27 848
Elaine Hiller United States 6 393 0.8× 88 0.4× 145 0.7× 140 1.0× 51 0.5× 9 526
John Malick United States 11 333 0.7× 158 0.8× 136 0.7× 133 0.9× 73 0.7× 12 627
Shanna Gustafson United States 12 290 0.6× 109 0.5× 79 0.4× 173 1.2× 74 0.7× 16 636
Monica Marvin United States 13 335 0.7× 111 0.5× 94 0.5× 107 0.8× 69 0.6× 27 594

Countries citing papers authored by Cecelia Bellcross

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cecelia Bellcross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cecelia Bellcross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cecelia Bellcross more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cecelia Bellcross

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cecelia Bellcross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cecelia Bellcross. The network helps show where Cecelia Bellcross may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cecelia Bellcross

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cecelia Bellcross. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cecelia Bellcross based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cecelia Bellcross. Cecelia Bellcross is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
King, Andrew P., Nadia Ali, Cecelia Bellcross, et al.. (2023). Healthcare Experiences of African American Women with the Fragile X Premutation. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 11(6). 3390–3400.
2.
Ali, Nadia, et al.. (2023). Genetic counselors' perceptions of student supervision across service delivery models. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 32(6). 1314–1324. 1 indexed citations
3.
Zhao, Jingsong, Colleen M. McBride, Gavin P. Campbell, et al.. (2023). Your Family Connects: A Theory-Based Intervention to Encourage Communication about Possible Inherited Cancer Risk among Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Close Relatives. Public Health Genomics. 26(1). 77–89. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ali, Nadia, et al.. (2022). The diagnostic experience of women with fragile X–associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI). Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 40(1). 179–190. 8 indexed citations
5.
Bellcross, Cecelia. (2022). Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 49(1). 117–147. 9 indexed citations
6.
7.
8.
Welch, Brandon M., Caitlin G. Allen, Lewis J. Frey, et al.. (2021). Comparison of a Cancer Family History Collection and Risk Assessment Tool – ItRunsInMyFamily – with Risk Assessment by Health-Care Professionals. Public Health Genomics. 25(3-4). 80–88. 3 indexed citations
9.
Charen, Krista, Lisa Shubeck, Allyn McConkie‐Rosell, et al.. (2021). Men with an FMR1 premutation and their health education needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling. 30(4). 1156–1167. 1 indexed citations
10.
Guan, Yue, Eric J. Nehl, Celeste M. Condit, et al.. (2019). Willingness to decrease mammogram frequency among women at low risk for hereditary breast cancer. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 9599–9599. 8 indexed citations
11.
12.
Bellcross, Cecelia, Walid L. Shaib, Jeffrey M. Switchenko, et al.. (2019). The Impact of Genetic Counseling Educational Tools on Patients’ Knowledge of Molecular Testing Terminology. Journal of Cancer Education. 35(5). 864–870. 11 indexed citations
13.
Bellcross, Cecelia, et al.. (2014). Implementing a Screening Tool for Identifying Patients at Risk for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer: A Statewide Initiative. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 21(10). 3342–3347. 29 indexed citations
14.
Bellcross, Cecelia, Lucy A. Peipins, Frances McCarty, et al.. (2014). Characteristics associated with genetic counseling referral and BRCA1/2 testing among women in a large integrated health system. Genetics in Medicine. 17(1). 43–50. 33 indexed citations
15.
Leadbetter, Steven, Nikki A. Hawkins, Frances McCarty, et al.. (2013). Recruiting Women for a Study on Perceived Risk of Cancer: Influence of Survey Topic Salience and Early Versus Late Response. Preventing Chronic Disease. 10. E75–E75. 12 indexed citations
16.
Bellcross, Cecelia, Patricia Z. Page, & Dana Meaney‐Delman. (2012). Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing and Cancer Risk Prediction. The Cancer Journal. 18(4). 293–302. 31 indexed citations
17.
Bellcross, Cecelia, Elvan Daniels, Debra Duquette, et al.. (2011). Implementing screening for Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer: Summary of a public health/clinical collaborative meeting. Genetics in Medicine. 1–1. 1 indexed citations
18.
Bellcross, Cecelia & W. David Dotson. (2010). Tumor Gene Expression Profiling in Women with Breast CancerTest Category: Prognostic. PLoS Currents. 2. RRN1178–RRN1178. 2 indexed citations
19.
Bellcross, Cecelia, Katherine Kolor, Katrina A.B. Goddard, et al.. (2010). Awareness and Utilization of BRCA1/2 Testing Among U.S. Primary Care Physicians. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 40(1). 61–66. 132 indexed citations
20.
Bellcross, Cecelia, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of a breast/ovarian cancer genetics referral screening tool in a mammography population. Genetics in Medicine. 11(11). 783–789. 90 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bronson D. Riley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gord Glendon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lisa R. Susswein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Forman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan Tinley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vickie L. Venne Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elaine Hiller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John Malick Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shanna Gustafson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Monica Marvin
Rankless by CCL
2026