Morag Shiach
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kelly OliverDavi NakanoMikko KoriaEmerson Gomes dos SantosHeta PyrhönenCatherine GallagherRachel CooperJon Dovey
- Topics
- Cultural Industries and Urban Development (6 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers)Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Morag Shiach
18 papers receiving 138 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Sociology and Political Science 63
- Literature and Literary Theory 58
- Gender Studies 48
- Social Psychology 29
- Philosophy 24
Countries citing papers authored by Morag Shiach
This map shows the geographic impact of Morag Shiach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Morag Shiach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Morag Shiach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Morag Shiach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Morag Shiach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Morag Shiach. The network helps show where Morag Shiach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Morag Shiach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Morag Shiach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Morag Shiach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Morag Shiach. Morag Shiach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | Report 2: A Framework for Universityled Creative Economy Innovation: Core Learning from the AHRC Creative Economy Hubs programme | 2 |
| 4 | London Creative and Digital Fusion | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Modernism, Labour and Selfhood in British Literature and Culture, 1890–1930 | 13 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Feminism and cultural studies | 27 |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Hélène Cixous : a politics of writing | 14 |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | Discourse on popular culture: class, gender and history in the analysis of popular culture. | 1 |
About Morag Shiach
Morag Shiach is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 28 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (6 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (2 papers) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (58 citations), Gender Studies (48 citations) and Architecture (5 citations). Morag Shiach has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Kelly Oliver, Davi Nakano, Mikko Koria, Emerson Gomes dos Santos, Heta Pyrhönen, Catherine Gallagher, Rachel Cooper, Jon Dovey, Susan Elizabeth Sweeney and Marco Dima. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Geoforum and Poetics Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.