Michelle M. Wright
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Caribbean history, culture, and politics
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Music top 5%
Papers in
-
- German Colonialism and Identity Studies 4
- Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies 3
-
- Race, History, and American Society 2
- Sociology and Education Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Tina M. Campt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Callaloo (3 papers)American Literary History (1 paper)African American Review (1 paper)The Black Scholar (1 paper)International Affairs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippinesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michelle M. Wright
18 papers receiving 230 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Cultural Studies 71
- Music 20
- Literature and Literary Theory 69
- Anthropology 47
- Gender Studies 41
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle M. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle M. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle M. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle M. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle M. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle M. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle M. Wright. The network helps show where Michelle M. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Michelle M. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 107 | |
| 2 | Physics of Blackness: Beyond the Middle Passage Epistemology | 2015 | 56 |
| 3 | 2004 | 53 | |
| 4 | Domain Errors! Cyberfeminist Practices | 2003 | 32 |
| 5 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 14 | |
| 7 | Blackness and sexualities | 2007 | 11 |
| 8 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 20 | Racism, Technology, and the Limits of Western Knowledge | 2003 | 1 |
About Michelle M. Wright
Michelle M. Wright is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Communication, having authored 22 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include German Colonialism and Identity Studies (4 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (3 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Race, History, and American Society (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture (1 paper), Sociology and Education Studies (1 paper) and Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (71 citations), Music (20 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (69 citations), Anthropology (47 citations) and Gender Studies (41 citations). Michelle M. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Philippines and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tina M. Campt. Their work appears in journals such as Callaloo, American Literary History, African American Review, The Black Scholar and International Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.