Mona Simion

2.1k citations
50 papers · 599 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Mona Simion

44 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

Mona Simion
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Philosophy 437
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 202
  • Health Informatics 17
  • History and Philosophy of Science 53
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 207
Replace Matthias Steup with:
Matthias Steup United States
Elizabeth Fricker United States
Rachel McKinnon United States
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa Canada
Frederick F. Schmitt United States
Jeremy Fantl Canada
Sharon Ryan United States
Michael Luntley United Kingdom
Marie McGinn United Kingdom
William F. Vallicella United States
Mona Simion relative to Matthias Steup United States Matthias Steup's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Matthias Steup · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mona Simion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mona Simion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mona Simion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mona Simion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mona Simion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mona Simion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mona Simion. The network helps show where Mona Simion may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Mona Simion, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mona Simion Line = papers co-authored together Mona Simion links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201955
2 201750
3 201938
4 202033
5 201533
6 202330
7 201630
8 201729
9 202327
10 202025
11 202323
12 202118
13 201814
14 202414
15 202114
16 201814
17 202311
18 201511
19 20258
20 20178

About Mona Simion

Mona Simion is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 50 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (44 papers), Free Will and Agency (19 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (18 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (9 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (437 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (202 citations), Health Informatics (17 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (53 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (207 citations). Mona Simion has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Kelp, J. Adam Carter, Emma C. Gordon and Cameron Boult. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Inquiry, Philosophical Issues, Philosophical Studies and Episteme.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact