Frederick F. Schmitt
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 13
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 3
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 3
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
-
- Philosophy and History of Science 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 4
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies 2
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 2
- Journals
- The Philosophical Review (4 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3 papers)Synthese (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Frederick F. Schmitt
31 papers receiving 441 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Philosophy 331
- History and Philosophy of Science 97
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 182
- Cognitive Neuroscience 115
- Sociology and Political Science 138
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick F. Schmitt
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick F. Schmitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick F. Schmitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick F. Schmitt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick F. Schmitt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick F. Schmitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick F. Schmitt. The network helps show where Frederick F. Schmitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Frederick F. Schmitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 71 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 6 | Theories of truth | 2004 | 3 |
| 7 | 2004 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1993 | 132 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 3 |
About Frederick F. Schmitt
Frederick F. Schmitt is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 542 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (2 papers) and Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (331 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (97 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (182 citations). Frederick F. Schmitt has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ernest Sosa, Marian David, William P. Alston, M. Jamie Ferreira, Oliver R. Scholz and Raimo Tuomela. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.