Matthias Steup
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Edward CraigWilliam AlstonJonathan Jenkins IchikawaRobert AlmederErnest SosaAbrol FairweatherJohn TurriKevin McCain
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers)Free Will and Agency (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Matthias Steup
32 papers receiving 689 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Philosophy 671
- Cognitive Neuroscience 326
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 289
- Sociology and Political Science 165
- History and Philosophy of Science 112
Countries citing papers authored by Matthias Steup
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias Steup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias Steup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias Steup more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias Steup
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias Steup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias Steup. The network helps show where Matthias Steup may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthias Steup
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthias Steup. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthias Steup based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthias Steup. Matthias Steup is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 35 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2nd Edition | 4 |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | Recensioni/Reviews-Knowledge, Truth, and Duty. Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue | 4 |
| 12 | Real Knowing New Versions of the Coherence Theory | 0 |
| 13 | 98 | |
| 14 | Doxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Deontology | 68 |
| 15 | Epistemic deontology and the voluntariness of belief | 2 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Matthias Steup
Matthias Steup is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers) and Free Will and Agency (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (671 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (112 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (289 citations). Matthias Steup has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edward Craig, William Alston, Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa, Robert Almeder, Ernest Sosa, Abrol Fairweather, John Turri, Kevin McCain, Jonathan Dancy and Linda Zagzebski. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.