Matthias Steup

1.9k total citations
37 papers, 814 citations indexed

About

Matthias Steup is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthias Steup has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 814 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Philosophy, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Matthias Steup's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers) and Free Will and Agency (7 papers). Matthias Steup is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (17 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers) and Free Will and Agency (7 papers). Matthias Steup collaborates with scholars based in United States. Matthias Steup's co-authors include Edward Craig, William Alston, Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa, Robert Almeder, Ernest Sosa, Abrol Fairweather, John Turri, Kevin McCain, Jonathan Dancy and Linda Zagzebski and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.

In The Last Decade

Matthias Steup

32 papers receiving 689 citations

Peers

Matthias Steup
Alan Millar United Kingdom
Richard Foley United States
Jonathan L. Kvanvig United States
Thomas Kelly United States
Jonathan E. Adler United States
Edward Craig United Kingdom
Mona Simion United Kingdom
Alan Millar United Kingdom
Matthias Steup
Citations per year, relative to Matthias Steup Matthias Steup (= 1×) peers Alan Millar

Countries citing papers authored by Matthias Steup

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthias Steup's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthias Steup with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthias Steup more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthias Steup

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthias Steup. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthias Steup. The network helps show where Matthias Steup may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthias Steup

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthias Steup. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthias Steup based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthias Steup. Matthias Steup is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Steup, Matthias. (2024). Problems for phenomenal explanationism. 3(2).
2.
McCain, Kevin, et al.. (2021). Epistemic Dilemmas. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 1 indexed citations
3.
Steup, Matthias. (2019). Easy Knowledge, Circularity, and the Puzzle of Reliability Knowledge. Episteme. 16(4). 453–473. 1 indexed citations
4.
Steup, Matthias. (2018). Doxastic Voluntarism and Up-To-Me-Ness. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 26(4). 611–618. 2 indexed citations
5.
Steup, Matthias. (2016). Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Analysis. anw045–anw045. 2 indexed citations
6.
Steup, Matthias. (2011). Belief control and intentionality. Synthese. 188(2). 145–163. 35 indexed citations
7.
Dancy, Jonathan, Ernest Sosa, & Matthias Steup. (2010). A companion to epistemology, second edition. 23(1). 411–2. 2 indexed citations
8.
Steup, Matthias. (2009). Empiricism, metaphysics, and voluntarism. Synthese. 178(1). 19–26. 9 indexed citations
9.
Steup, Matthias, John Turri, & Ernest Sosa. (2008). Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 2nd Edition. 4 indexed citations
10.
Steup, Matthias. (2007). Doxastic freedom. Synthese. 161(3). 375–392. 64 indexed citations
11.
Steup, Matthias, Abrol Fairweather, & Linda Zagzebski. (2004). Recensioni/Reviews-Knowledge, Truth, and Duty. Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue. 27(2). 4 indexed citations
12.
Steup, Matthias. (2002). Real Knowing New Versions of the Coherence Theory. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 64(3). 740–743.
13.
Steup, Matthias. (2001). Knowledge, truth, and duty : essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven). 98 indexed citations
14.
Steup, Matthias. (2000). Doxastic Voluntarism and Epistemic Deontology. Acta Analytica. 15(1). 68 indexed citations
15.
Steup, Matthias. (2000). Epistemic deontology and the voluntariness of belief. Acta Analytica. 15. 2 indexed citations
16.
Steup, Matthias & Robert Almeder. (2000). Harmless Naturalism: The Limits of Science and the Nature of Philosophy. The Philosophical Review. 109(3). 462–462. 5 indexed citations
17.
Steup, Matthias. (1997). William Alston, Perceiving God. The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Noûs. 31(3). 408–420. 1 indexed citations
18.
Steup, Matthias. (1996). Tidman on critical reflection. Analysis. 56(4). 277–281. 1 indexed citations
19.
Steup, Matthias. (1995). Epistemology’s Paradox. International Studies in Philosophy. 27(2). 118–120. 1 indexed citations
20.
Steup, Matthias. (1989). The regress of metajustification. Philosophical Studies. 55(1). 41–56. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026