Min-Shik Kim
- Food Science top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Guiim MoonYoung-Ja LeeSoon‐Mi ShimKyle R. CaveLynn C. RobertsonLisa K. SonDong‐Jin LeeGo Eun Lee
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers)Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- South KoreaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Min-Shik Kim
12 papers receiving 262 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Food Science 118
- Cognitive Neuroscience 85
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 64
- Nutrition and Dietetics 41
- Plant Science 32
Countries citing papers authored by Min-Shik Kim
This map shows the geographic impact of Min-Shik Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Min-Shik Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Min-Shik Kim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Min-Shik Kim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Min-Shik Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Min-Shik Kim. The network helps show where Min-Shik Kim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Min-Shik Kim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Min-Shik Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Min-Shik Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Min-Shik Kim. Min-Shik Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 184 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Memory in visual search: Evidence from search efficiency | 1 |
| 15 | Visual Marking is Independent of Working Memory | 0 |
| 16 | The Influence of Executive Working Memory on Exogenous and Endogenous Cuing Effects | 1 |
| 17 | ADHD 아동의 회귀억제 결함 | 0 |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 28 |
About Min-Shik Kim
Min-Shik Kim is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 281 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (118 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (4 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (85 citations). Min-Shik Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Guiim Moon, Young-Ja Lee, Soon‐Mi Shim, Kyle R. Cave, Lynn C. Robertson, Lisa K. Son, Dong‐Jin Lee, Go Eun Lee, Myeong‐jin Lee and Sanghee Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.