Michelle Sweet
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 6
- Health Policy Implementation Science 3
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 10
- Co-authors
- Kylie Dingwall (15 shared papers)Tricia Nagel (15 shared papers)Emily Stewart (3 shared papers)Fiona Shand (6 shared papers)Michael Kisielewski (2 shared papers)Anne Lowell (5 shared papers)Lisa L. Willett (2 shared papers)Christopher Williams (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The American Journal of Medicine (5 papers)BMC Nephrology (3 papers)JMIR Mental Health (2 papers)Systematic Reviews (2 papers)BMC Psychology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michelle Sweet
30 papers receiving 345 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Applied Psychology 105
- Family Practice 16
- General Health Professions 167
- Gender Studies 59
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 116
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Sweet
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Sweet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Sweet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Sweet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Sweet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Sweet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Sweet. The network helps show where Michelle Sweet may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Sweet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 5 |
About Michelle Sweet
Michelle Sweet is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gender Studies and Emergency Medicine, having authored 30 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (105 citations), Family Practice (16 citations), General Health Professions (167 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (116 citations). Michelle Sweet has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kylie Dingwall, Tricia Nagel, Emily Stewart, Fiona Shand, Michael Kisielewski, Anne Lowell, Lisa L. Willett, Christopher Williams, Jaquelyne T. Hughes and Alan Cass. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, BMC Nephrology, JMIR Mental Health, Systematic Reviews and BMC Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.