Ricardo Correa
- Finance top 0.5%
- Accounting top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 5%
- Co-authors
- Horacio SaprizaUǧur LelConstantine A. StratakisLuis Brandão-MarquesAndrei ZlateGustavo SuárezLamont BlackHao Zhou
- Topics
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (60 papers)Global Financial Crisis and Policies (39 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (24 papers)
- Journals
- Nature GeneticsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Financial Economics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandGermany
In The Last Decade
Ricardo Correa
90 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Finance 1.1k
- Accounting 589
- Economics and Econometrics 480
- Surgery 281
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 206
Countries citing papers authored by Ricardo Correa
This map shows the geographic impact of Ricardo Correa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ricardo Correa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ricardo Correa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ricardo Correa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ricardo Correa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ricardo Correa. The network helps show where Ricardo Correa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ricardo Correa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ricardo Correa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ricardo Correa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ricardo Correa. Ricardo Correa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 75 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 224 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | La curva de rendimientos y la toma de decisiones financieras | 2 |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 156 |
About Ricardo Correa
Ricardo Correa is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (60 papers), Global Financial Crisis and Policies (39 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (1.1k citations), Accounting (589 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (206 citations). Ricardo Correa has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Horacio Sapriza, Uǧur Lel, Constantine A. Stratakis, Luis Brandão-Marques, Andrei Zlate, Gustavo Suárez, Lamont Black, Hao Zhou, Xin Huang and Esther Segalla. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Genetics, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Financial Economics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.