Kylie Dingwall
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health top 5%
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Papers in
-
- Digital Mental Health Interventions 11
- Health 10
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights 9
- Co-authors
- Sheree Cairney (13 shared papers)Tricia Nagel (18 shared papers)Michelle Sweet (15 shared papers)Paul Maruff (7 shared papers)Melissa Lindeman (7 shared papers)Anne Lowell (6 shared papers)Matthew Lewis (3 shared papers)James Bennett–Levy (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMC Psychology (3 papers)BMC Nephrology (3 papers)Australian Psychologist (3 papers)Drug and Alcohol Review (3 papers)JMIR Mental Health (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kylie Dingwall
39 papers receiving 725 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Applied Psychology 163
- Health 135
- General Health Professions 281
- Clinical Psychology 135
- Neurology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Kylie Dingwall
This map shows the geographic impact of Kylie Dingwall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kylie Dingwall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kylie Dingwall more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kylie Dingwall
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kylie Dingwall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kylie Dingwall. The network helps show where Kylie Dingwall may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kylie Dingwall, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 93 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2010 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 15 |
About Kylie Dingwall
Kylie Dingwall is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Neurology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 39 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (11 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (9 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (7 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (163 citations), Health (135 citations), General Health Professions (281 citations), Clinical Psychology (135 citations) and Neurology (83 citations). Kylie Dingwall has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sheree Cairney, Tricia Nagel, Michelle Sweet, Paul Maruff, Melissa Lindeman, Anne Lowell, Matthew Lewis, James Bennett–Levy, Darlene Rotumah and Stephen C. Bowden. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Psychology, BMC Nephrology, Australian Psychologist, Drug and Alcohol Review and JMIR Mental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.