Michael Smith

271 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Michael Smith's Hit Papers

Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings 2018 · 626 citations
6260+12+24Years since publication250500750

Peers

Michael Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Philosophy 2.1k
  • Forestry 84
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 638
  • Applied Psychology 88
Replace Daniel H. Freeman with:
Daniel H. Freeman United Kingdom
Randolph M. Nesse United States
Roger K. Blashfield United States
Timothy R. Levine United States
Jerome E. Singer United States
Julian Savulescu United Kingdom
Eiko Fried Netherlands
Luis Salvador‐Carulla Australia
Angélique O. J. Cramer Netherlands
Marieke Wichers Netherlands
Michael Smith relative to Daniel H. Freeman United Kingdom Daniel H. Freeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.6×
Daniel H. Freeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Smith. The network helps show where Michael Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Smith Line = papers co-authored together Michael Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 289 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
The Moral Problem
Hit paper breakdown →
1994961
2
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
Hit paper breakdown →
2018626
3
Dispositional Theories of Value
Hit paper breakdown →
1989475
4 1996402
5 1987337
6 1998331
7 1964257
8 1997220
9 1988183
10 1996172
11 1993160
12 2003148
13 2013138
14 2010135
15 1990132
16 199787
17 200185
18 200479
19 199476
20 200170

About Michael Smith

Michael Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Ecology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 289 papers that have together received 8.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (63 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (11 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Mental Health via Writing (7 papers), Sports Analytics and Performance (7 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (4 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (2.1k citations), Forestry (84 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (69 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (638 citations) and Applied Psychology (88 citations). Michael Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Philip N. Pettit, J. Douglas Crawford, Mark A Wetherell, Jonathan K. Foster, Richard H. Hart, Eliana M. Klier, Christopher D.�M. Fletcher, Denise Y. P. Henriques, Eduardo J. Calonje and Alfred Beham. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Psychology and Health, Stress, Ratio and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact