Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationships in Psychometric Data
20123.0k citationsSacha Epskamp, Angélique O. J. Cramer et al.profile →
Network Analysis: An Integrative Approach to the Structure of Psychopathology
20132.6k citationsDenny Borsboom, Angélique O. J. Cramerprofile →
Comorbidity: A network perspective
20101.0k citationsAngélique O. J. Cramer, Lourens Waldorp et al.Behavioral and Brain Sciencesprofile →
Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights
2016682 citationsEiko I. Fried, Claudia D. van Borkulo et al.Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiologyprofile →
State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R
2014629 citationsSacha Epskamp, Denny Borsboom et al.profile →
Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology
2017596 citationsEiko I. Fried, Angélique O. J. CramerPerspectives on Psychological Scienceprofile →
Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena
2011498 citationsVerena D. Schmittmann, Angélique O. J. Cramer et al.New Ideas in Psychologyprofile →
Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression
2013492 citationsIngrid A. van de Leemput, Marieke Wichers et al.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesprofile →
Major Depression as a Complex Dynamic System
2016344 citationsAngélique O. J. Cramer, Claudia D. van Borkulo et al.profile →
Hidden multiplicity in exploratory multiway ANOVA: Prevalence and remedies
2015309 citationsAngélique O. J. Cramer, Lourens Waldorp et al.profile →
Personalized Network Modeling in Psychopathology: The Importance of Contemporaneous and Temporal Connections
2018279 citationsSacha Epskamp, Claudia D. van Borkulo et al.Clinical Psychological Scienceprofile →
Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice
2021152 citationsLaura F. Bringmann, Casper J. Albers et al.Behaviour Research and Therapyprofile →
Cross-Lagged Network Models
202296 citationsAngélique O. J. Cramer, Mijke Rhemtulla et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Angélique O. J. Cramer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Angélique O. J. Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angélique O. J. Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angélique O. J. Cramer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angélique O. J. Cramer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angélique O. J. Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angélique O. J. Cramer. The network helps show where Angélique O. J. Cramer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angélique O. J. Cramer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angélique O. J. Cramer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angélique O. J. Cramer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Angélique O. J. Cramer. Angélique O. J. Cramer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bringmann, Laura F., Casper J. Albers, Claudi Bockting, et al.. (2021). Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 149. 104011–104011.152 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Cramer, Angélique O. J., et al.. (2020). A network approach to studying the associations between PTSD symptoms and dissociative experiences. Journal of Traumatic Stress.4 indexed citations
Epskamp, Sacha, Claudia D. van Borkulo, Date C. van der Veen, et al.. (2018). Personalized Network Modeling in Psychopathology: The Importance of Contemporaneous and Temporal Connections. Clinical Psychological Science. 6(3). 416–427.279 indexed citations breakdown →
Fried, Eiko I., Claudia D. van Borkulo, Angélique O. J. Cramer, et al.. (2016). Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 52(1). 1–10.682 indexed citations breakdown →
Nuijten, Michèle B., Marie K. Deserno, Angélique O. J. Cramer, & Denny Borsboom. (2016). Mental disorders as complex networks : An introduction and overview of a network approach to psychopathology. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 13. 68–76.23 indexed citations
Leemput, Ingrid A. van de, Marieke Wichers, Angélique O. J. Cramer, et al.. (2013). Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(1). 87–92.492 indexed citations breakdown →
Cramer, Angélique O. J., K. S. Kendler, & Denny Borsboom. (2011). Where are the genes? The implications of a network perspective on gene hunting in psychopathology. [A commentary on Johnson et al.].. European Journal of Personality. 25(4). 270–271.6 indexed citations
18.
Borsboom, Denny, Sacha Epskamp, Rogier Kievit, Angélique O. J. Cramer, & Verena D. Schmittmann. (2011). Transdiagnostic Networks. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 6(6). 610–614.46 indexed citations
19.
Schmittmann, Verena D., Angélique O. J. Cramer, Lourens Waldorp, et al.. (2011). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology. 31(1). 43–53.498 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Borsboom, Denny, et al.. (2009). The End of Construct Validity. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 135–170.65 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.