Psychology and Health

2.6k papers and 89.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Psychology and Health in the last decades have received a total of 89.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychology and Health usually cover Applied Psychology (944 papers), Clinical Psychology (682 papers) and General Health Professions (608 papers) specifically the topics of Behavioral Health and Interventions (748 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (229 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (220 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychology and Health are Albert Bandura, John Weinman, Jonathan A. Smith, Robert Horne, Lucy Yardley, Ralf Schwarzer, Martin S. Hagger, Keith J. Petrie, Sheina Orbell and Rona Moss‐Morris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Psychology and Health

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychology and Health. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychology and Health.

Countries where authors publish in Psychology and Health

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychology and Health. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychology and Health with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychology and Health more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025