J. Douglas Crawford
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.2%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- W. Pieter MedendorpTutis VilisDenise Y. P. HenriquesEliana M. KlierMichael VesiaHerbert C. GoltzHongying WangDouglas Tweed
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (116 papers)Motor Control and Adaptation (65 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (47 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
J. Douglas Crawford
192 papers receiving 7.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Cognitive Neuroscience 5.7k
- Neurology 1.4k
- Social Psychology 677
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 647
- Human-Computer Interaction 538
Countries citing papers authored by J. Douglas Crawford
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Douglas Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Douglas Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Douglas Crawford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Douglas Crawford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Douglas Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Douglas Crawford. The network helps show where J. Douglas Crawford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Douglas Crawford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Douglas Crawford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Douglas Crawford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Douglas Crawford. J. Douglas Crawford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | Online updating of spatial and temporal aspects of manual interception | 1 |
| 11 | 127 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | An integrative framework for measuring the extent to which organizational variables influence the success of process improvement programs | 1 |
| 17 | 337 | |
| 18 | 37 | |
| 19 | 87 | |
| 20 | Visuomotor codes for three-dimensional saccades | 1 |
About J. Douglas Crawford
J. Douglas Crawford is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology and Developmental Biology, having authored 199 papers that have together received 7.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (116 papers), Motor Control and Adaptation (65 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (47 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (5.7k citations), Neurology (1.4k citations) and Developmental Biology (298 citations). J. Douglas Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include W. Pieter Medendorp, Tutis Vilis, Denise Y. P. Henriques, Eliana M. Klier, Michael Vesia, Herbert C. Goltz, Hongying Wang, Douglas Tweed, Jonathan J. Marotta and Aarlenne Z. Khan. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and New England Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.