Clayton Roberts
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Murray G. MurpheyJohn M. WallaceMichael MendleJames FarrRichard JonesStephen KossDonald LammersDavid B. Roberts
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers)Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers)Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Clayton Roberts
23 papers receiving 253 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Political Science and International Relations 166
- Sociology and Political Science 142
- History 115
- Economics and Econometrics 78
- Philosophy 39
Countries citing papers authored by Clayton Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Clayton Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clayton Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clayton Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clayton Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clayton Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clayton Roberts. The network helps show where Clayton Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clayton Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clayton Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clayton Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clayton Roberts. Clayton Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 81 | |
| 3 | 55 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | Schemes & undertakings : a study of English politics in the seventeenth century | 4 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | A history of England | 0 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Clayton Roberts
Clayton Roberts is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (115 citations), Political Science and International Relations (166 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (19 citations). Clayton Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Murray G. Murphey, John M. Wallace, Michael Mendle, James Farr, Richard Jones, Stephen Koss, Donald Lammers, David B. Roberts, R. J. Helmstadter and Arthur J. Slavin. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Yale Law Journal and Harvard Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.