Michael Howe

416 citations
24 papers · 289 indexed · h-index 11

Michael Howe

20 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Michael Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Insect Science 125
  • Earth-Surface Processes 56
  • Ecology 148
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 71
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 40
Replace Péter János Kiss with:
Péter János Kiss Hungary
Wilson Júnior Oliveira Brazil
P. S. Cranston Australia
Ian F. G. McLean United Kingdom
R. H. Silversides Canada
Markus Melin Finland
Catharina Clewing Germany
John Skartveit Norway
Mansoureh Malekian Iran
Alexandre Portheault Spain
Michael Howe relative to Péter János Kiss Hungary Péter János Kiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Péter János Kiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Howe. The network helps show where Michael Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Howe Line = papers co-authored together Michael Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20245
4 20233
5 202217
6 202215
7 202113
8 20219
9 202012
10 201820
11 201356
12 200932
13
The Harvard Volunteers In Europe: Personal Records Of Experience In Military, Ambulance, And Hospital Service
20081
14 20041
15 20041
16 199219
17 198610
18 198641
19
Problems with wing tags: Evidence of harm to willets
198017
20
Observations on the terrestrial wing displays of breeding Willets
19745

About Michael Howe

Michael Howe is a scholar working on Insect Science, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 24 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (9 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (4 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (3 papers), Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (2 papers) and Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (125 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (56 citations), Ecology (148 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (71 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (40 citations). Michael Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth Pye, Simon J. Blott, M. J. Lehane, Kenneth F. Raffa, Allan L. Carroll, J. P. Chadwick, Claudio Gratton, Ken Keefover‐Ring, Robert Cheke and Michael J. Lehane. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Insect Conservation, Forest Ecology and Management, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, American Quarterly and Bulletin of Entomological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026