Diana L. Six
- Ecology top 0.5%
- Insect Science top 0.1%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Katherine P. BleikerBarbara BentzT. D. PaineMichael J. WingfieldKier D. KlepzigNicole M. GerardoDuur K. AanenUlrich G. Mueller
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (85 papers)Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (36 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaCanada
In The Last Decade
Diana L. Six
102 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Ecology 2.9k
- Insect Science 2.7k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 849
- Plant Science 812
- Cell Biology 540
Countries citing papers authored by Diana L. Six
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana L. Six's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana L. Six with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana L. Six more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana L. Six
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana L. Six. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana L. Six. The network helps show where Diana L. Six may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana L. Six
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana L. Six. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana L. Six based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana L. Six. Diana L. Six is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | Evaluation of rapid DNA extraction and identification of Phellinus pini associated with Pinus contorta by rDNA assay | 2 |
| 15 | 80 | |
| 16 | Exotic Invasive Elm Bark Beetle, Scolytus kirschii , Detected in South Africa | 6 |
| 17 | A rapid system for rating white pine blister rust incidence, severity, and within-tree distribution in whitebark pine | 9 |
| 18 | Bark beetle-fungal symbiosis: Context dependency in complex associations | 125 |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About Diana L. Six
Diana L. Six is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Endocrinology, having authored 106 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (85 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (36 papers) and Insect and Pesticide Research (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (2.7k citations), Ecology (2.9k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (849 citations). Diana L. Six has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Katherine P. Bleiker, Barbara Bentz, T. D. Paine, Michael J. Wingfield, Kier D. Klepzig, Nicole M. Gerardo, Duur K. Aanen, Ulrich G. Mueller, Ted R. Schultz and Aaron S. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Nature Reviews Microbiology and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.