Journal of Insect Conservation

1.8k papers and 32.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Journal of Insect Conservation in the last decades have received a total of 32.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Insect Conservation usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (934 papers) and Insect Science (582 papers) specifically the topics of Plant and animal studies (938 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (876 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (527 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Insect Conservation are T. R. New, Michael J. Samways, Roger L. H. Dennis, Keith S. Brown, Dave Goulson, Thomas Fartmann, M. S. Warren, James S. Pryke, Martin Konvička and John W. Dover.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Insect Conservation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Insect Conservation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Insect Conservation.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Insect Conservation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Insect Conservation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Insect Conservation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Insect Conservation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025