Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Bush
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Bush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Bush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Bush more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Bush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Bush. The network helps show where Michael D. Bush may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael D. Bush
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael D. Bush.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael D. Bush based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael D. Bush. Michael D. Bush is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bodily, Robert, Charles R. Graham, & Michael D. Bush. (2017). Online Learner Engagement: Opportunities and Challenges with Using Data Analytics. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 57(1). 10–18.13 indexed citations
Bush, Michael D.. (2015). Lessons from the past for the next generation of educational video. Educational Technology archive. 55(1). 33–39.1 indexed citations
6.
Bush, Michael D.. (2014). Educational technology points of inflection. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 54(2). 57–61.1 indexed citations
7.
Bush, Michael D.. (2013). Educational technology points of inflection: What MOOCs, flipped classrooms, and OLPC teach us about individualization of learninq. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 53(6). 60–63.2 indexed citations
8.
Bush, Michael D.. (2013). Educational technology points of inflection: Getting to where we are and need to be with educational technology. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 53(1). 61–63.
Bush, Michael D., et al.. (2011). E-Learning Standards: SCORM and the Future of Interoperability.. Educational Technology archive. 51(5). 20–24.1 indexed citations
Bush, Michael D., et al.. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology: Learner-centricity, content and tool malleability, and network effects. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 49(2). 3–20.21 indexed citations
Bush, Michael D., et al.. (2004). Customized Video Playback: Standards for Content Description, Customization, and Personalization. Educational technology: The magazine for managers of change in education. 44(4). 5–13.2 indexed citations
15.
Bush, Michael D.. (2002). Connecting Instructional Design to International Standards for Content Reusability.. Educational Technology archive. 42(6). 5–13.15 indexed citations
16.
Bush, Michael D. & Robert M. Terry. (1997). Technology-enhanced language learning.109 indexed citations
17.
Bush, Michael D., et al.. (1995). Analytic velocity functions. The Leading Edge. 14(7). 775–782.3 indexed citations
18.
Bush, Michael D.. (1991). Hardware for Language Training: Coping with Confusion.. 2(2). 77–91.1 indexed citations
19.
Bush, Michael D.. (1991). Interactive videodisc : the "why" and the "how".6 indexed citations
20.
Bush, Michael D.. (1983). Selected variables in the mathematical formulation of a model of second language learning. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.