Journal of the Philosophy of History

243 papers and 613 indexed citations i.

About

The 243 papers published in Journal of the Philosophy of History in the last decades have received a total of 613 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of the Philosophy of History usually cover History (96 papers), Philosophy (87 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (68 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, History, and Historiography (87 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (35 papers) and Development of Political Thought in Early Modern Era (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of the Philosophy of History are Mark Bevir, Martin O. Saar, Colin Koopman, Herman Paul, Thomas Biebricher, Marek Tamm, Paul A. Roth, Jutta Schickore, Frank Ankersmit and James Alexander.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of the Philosophy of History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of the Philosophy of History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of the Philosophy of History.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of the Philosophy of History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of the Philosophy of History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of the Philosophy of History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of the Philosophy of History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025