Mogens Lærke

699 total citations
50 papers, 146 citations indexed

About

Mogens Lærke is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mogens Lærke has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 146 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Philosophy, 19 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Mogens Lærke's work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (30 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (18 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (18 papers). Mogens Lærke is often cited by papers focused on Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (30 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (18 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (18 papers). Mogens Lærke collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Denmark. Mogens Lærke's co-authors include Pierre‐François Moreau, Leo Catana and Michael Beaney and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Quarterly and Isis.

In The Last Decade

Mogens Lærke

35 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers

Mogens Lærke
Wim Klever United States
Mogens Lærke
Citations per year, relative to Mogens Lærke Mogens Lærke (= 1×) peers Wim Klever

Countries citing papers authored by Mogens Lærke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mogens Lærke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mogens Lærke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mogens Lærke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mogens Lærke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mogens Lærke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mogens Lærke. The network helps show where Mogens Lærke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mogens Lærke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mogens Lærke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mogens Lærke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mogens Lærke. Mogens Lærke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lærke, Mogens. (2025). The Proleptic Principles of Samuel Parker. Early Science and Medicine. 30(2-3). 237–271.
2.
Beaney, Michael, et al.. (2024). Remembering Maria Rosa Antognazza (1964–2023). British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 32(3). 633–646.
3.
Lærke, Mogens. (2024). Kenelm Digby's logic of common and natural notions. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 63(2). 157–173.
4.
Catana, Leo & Mogens Lærke. (2020). Historiographies of philosophy 1800–1950. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 28(3). 431–441. 2 indexed citations
5.
Lærke, Mogens. (2019). Virtual Union, the Seeds of Hatred, and the Fraternal Joining of Hands: Leibniz and Toleration. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 1 indexed citations
6.
Lærke, Mogens. (2019). Virtual Union, the Seeds of Hatred, and the Fraternal Joining of Hands: Leibniz and Toleration. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
7.
Lærke, Mogens. (2019). French historiographical Spinozism, 1893–2018. Delbos, Gueroult, Vernière, Moreau. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 28(3). 653–672. 1 indexed citations
8.
Lærke, Mogens. (2017). Aspects of Spinoza’s Theory of Essence. Oxford University Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lærke, Mogens. (2016). La méthode géométrique dans la Demonstratio evangelica de Pierre-Daniel Huet. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 49–67.
10.
Lærke, Mogens. (2016). Spinoza on the Eternity of the Mind. Dialogue. 55(2). 265–286. 2 indexed citations
11.
Lærke, Mogens, et al.. (2014). Spinoza/Leibniz: Rencontres, controverses, réceptions. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 390. 3 indexed citations
12.
Lærke, Mogens. (2014). Spinoza’s Language. Journal of the history of philosophy. 52(3). 519–547. 7 indexed citations
13.
Lærke, Mogens. (2014). Spinoza's Metaphysics. Substance and Thought. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 22(3). 619–623. 13 indexed citations
14.
Lærke, Mogens. (2014). L'Art du portrait conceptuel. Deleuze et l'histoire de la philosophie. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 23(2). 393–396.
16.
Lærke, Mogens. (2011). Leibniz's Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. 93(1). 3 indexed citations
17.
Lærke, Mogens. (2011). The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's ‘Ethics’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy. 19(1). 149–153. 2 indexed citations
18.
Lærke, Mogens. (2011). Spinoza’s Cosmological Argument in the Ethics. Journal of the history of philosophy. 49(4). 439–462. 16 indexed citations
19.
Lærke, Mogens, et al.. (2011). A Conjecture about a Textual Mystery. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 21. 33–68.
20.
Lærke, Mogens, et al.. (2009). La Question du mal chez Leibniz. 19. 77–91. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026