Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Max Horkheimer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Max Horkheimer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Max Horkheimer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Max Horkheimer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Max Horkheimer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Max Horkheimer. The network helps show where Max Horkheimer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Max Horkheimer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Max Horkheimer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Max Horkheimer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Max Horkheimer. Max Horkheimer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Horkheimer, Max, et al.. (2002). Crítica de la Razón Instrumental.59 indexed citations
8.
Horkheimer, Max, Gunzelin Schmid Noerr, & Jan Baars. (1996). Nachträge, Verzeichnisse und Register. S. Fischer eBooks.1 indexed citations
9.
Horkheimer, Max, et al.. (1990). Commitment to higher education : seven West European thinkers on the essence of the university.11 indexed citations
10.
Horkheimer, Max & Alfred Schmidt. (1987). Vorlesung über die Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. S. Fischer eBooks.
11.
Horkheimer, Max & Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. (1987). Philosophische Frühschriften, 1922-1932. S. Fischer eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Horkheimer, Max & Gunzelin Schmid Noerr. (1985). Vorträge und Aufzeichnungen, 1949-1973 : 4. Soziologisches, 5. Universität und Studium. S. Fischer eBooks.
13.
Horkheimer, Max, Helmut Dubiel, & Alfons Söllner. (1981). Wirtschaft, Recht und Staat im Nationalsozialismus : Analysen des Instituts für Sozialforschung, 1939-1942. Europäische Verlagsanstalt eBooks.2 indexed citations
14.
Jay, Martin, et al.. (1977). L'imagination dialectique : histoire de l'École de Francfort et de l'Institut de Recherches Sociales (1923-1950). Payot eBooks.1 indexed citations
15.
Horkheimer, Max. (1976). El Estado autoritario. 167–188.2 indexed citations
16.
Horkheimer, Max. (1974). "Aus der Pubertät : Novellen und Tagebuchblätter" 1914-1918. S. Fischer eBooks.1 indexed citations
17.
Horkheimer, Max, Claude Maillard, & Sibylle Müller. (1974). Théorie traditionnelle et théorie critique. Gallimard eBooks.14 indexed citations
18.
Horkheimer, Max. (1972). The social function of philosophy. Radical philosophy. 3.2 indexed citations
19.
Horkheimer, Max, et al.. (1971). Anfänge der bürgerlichen Geschichtsphilosophie : Hegel und das Problem der Metaphysik : Montaigne und die Funktion der Skepsis.1 indexed citations
20.
Adorno, Theodor W. & Max Horkheimer. (1963). Zeugnisse : Theodor W. Adorno zum sechzigsten Geburtstag. Europäische Verlagsanstalt eBooks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.