Radical philosophy

278 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 278 papers published in Radical philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Radical philosophy usually cover Sociology and Political Science (60 papers), Philosophy (31 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (14 papers) specifically the topics of Political Economy and Marxism (18 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (14 papers) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Radical philosophy are Ted Benton, Kate Soper, Erica Fudge, David Archard, Michel Foucault, Stuart Hall, Nina Power, Paul K. Feyerabend, Kathleen Lennon and Linda Martín Alcoff.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Radical philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Radical philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Radical philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Radical philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Radical philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Radical philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Radical philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025