John Cumming

3.9k citations
50 papers · 2.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

John Cumming

42 papers receiving 1.8k citations

John Cumming's Hit Papers

Truth and Method 1977 · 1.5k citations
1.5k0+16+32Years since publication4008001.2k

Peers

John Cumming
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • General Psychology 53
  • Philosophy 394
  • Research and Theory 21
  • Clinical Psychology 491
  • Social Psychology 445
Replace David E. Linge with:
David E. Linge United States
Garrett Barden Iceland
Hans‐Georg Gadamer Germany
Rose Laub Coser United States
Jean‐Paul Sartre France
Daniel J. Levinson United States
R. S. Peters United Kingdom
Edgar Z. Friedenberg United States
Wendy Hollway United Kingdom
Hazel E. Barnes South Africa
John Cumming relative to David E. Linge United States David E. Linge's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
David E. Linge · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Cumming

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Cumming's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Cumming with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Cumming more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Cumming

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Cumming. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Cumming. The network helps show where John Cumming may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Cumming, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Cumming Line = papers co-authored together John Cumming links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Truth and Method
Hit paper breakdown →
19771491
2 1957210
3 1965128
4 1958106
5 197486
6
Critical theory of society
197172
7 195951
8 196140
9 196531
10 195927
11
A philosophy of the future
197026
12 196319
13 195617
14 197613
15 195613
16 195612
17 195812
18 196312
19 196210
20 197110

About John Cumming

John Cumming is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Philosophy, Social Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (1 paper) and Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (53 citations), Philosophy (394 citations), Research and Theory (21 citations), Clinical Psychology (491 citations) and Social Psychology (445 citations). John Cumming has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hans‐Georg Gadamer, Garrett Barden, David E. Linge, Elaine Cumming, Albrecht Wellmer, Frank S. Freeman, Thomas S. McPartland, Geoffrey Pearson, Max Horkheimer and Martin Jay. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services, Human Organization, diacritics and Psychiatric Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact