This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diogenes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diogenes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diogenes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Diogenes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diogenes.
About Diogenes
The 1.1k papers published in Diogenes in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Diogenes usually cover Philosophy (102 papers), Anthropology (75 papers) and Religious studies (29 papers) specifically the topics of Islamic Studies and History (41 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (35 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (22 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (22 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (22 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (20 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (17 papers) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diogenes are Hansfried Kellner, Peter L. Berger, Jerzy Kuryłowicz, Hélène Joffé, Roman Jakobson, Jean Starobinski, Dwight Macdonald, Zhao Tingyang, Nicholas DiFonzo and Prashant Bordia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.