Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Max HorkheimerTheodor W. Adorno
- Journal
- Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w3293907 →Countries where authors are citing Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente
This map shows the geographic impact of Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente
This network shows the impact of Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente.
About Dialektik der Aufklärung : philosophische Fragmente
This paper, published in 1969, received 190 indexed citations . Written by Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorno covering the research area of Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Sociology and Political Science (95 citations), Political Science and International Relations (33 citations), Philosophy (28 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (20 citations) and Anthropology (14 citations). Published in Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w3293907.