Matthew Innes
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Marios Costambeys (3 shared papers)Simon MacLean (1 shared paper)Elisabeth van Houts (1 shared paper)Rob Meens (1 shared paper)Dominic Janes (1 shared paper)Walter Pohl (1 shared paper)Catherine Cubitt (1 shared paper)Rosamond McKitterick (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- History of European Ideas (1 paper)International Journal of the Classical Tradition (1 paper)Early Medieval Europe (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)Journal of Agrarian Change (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Matthew Innes
13 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Classics 127
- History 104
- Anthropology 24
- Archeology 24
- History and Philosophy of Science 9
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Innes
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Innes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Innes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Innes. The network helps show where Matthew Innes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Innes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 44 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 42 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 2 | |
| 12 | Rituales, derechos y relaciones: algunas donaciones y su interpretación en el cartulario de Fulda, c 827 | 2014 | 1 |
| 13 | Land, freedom and the making of the early medieval west | 2006 | 1 |
| 14 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 0 |
About Matthew Innes
Matthew Innes is a scholar working on Classics, History, Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology and Archeology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (4 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Medieval History and Crusades (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper) and Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (127 citations), History (104 citations), Anthropology (24 citations), Archeology (24 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (9 citations). Matthew Innes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Marios Costambeys, Simon MacLean, Elisabeth van Houts, Rob Meens, Dominic Janes, Walter Pohl, Catherine Cubitt, Rosamond McKitterick, Cristina La Rocca and Yitzhak Hen. Their work appears in journals such as History of European Ideas, International Journal of the Classical Tradition, Early Medieval Europe, The Historical Journal and Journal of Agrarian Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.