1.7k total citations 20 papers, 223 citations indexed
About
Ian N. Wood is a scholar working on Classics, History and Archeology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Ian N. Wood has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 223 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Classics, 11 papers in History and 5 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Ian N. Wood's work include Medieval Literature and History (13 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (7 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers). Ian N. Wood is often cited by papers focused on Medieval Literature and History (13 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (7 papers) and Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (3 papers). Ian N. Wood collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and India. Ian N. Wood's co-authors include P. H. Sawyer, Thomas Renna, Helmut Reimitz, Walter Pohl, John Taylor, G. A. Loud, Clare A. Lees and Anne Cleary and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Roman Studies and Britannia.
In The Last Decade
Ian N. Wood
15 papers
receiving
150 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian N. Wood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian N. Wood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian N. Wood more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian N. Wood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian N. Wood. The network helps show where Ian N. Wood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian N. Wood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian N. Wood.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian N. Wood based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ian N. Wood. Ian N. Wood is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wood, Ian N.. (2020). Sidonius and the Burgundians. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 365–372.1 indexed citations
Wood, Ian N., et al.. (2007). Fragments of history: Rethinking the Ruthwell and Bewcastle monuments. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
4.
Wood, Ian N., G. A. Loud, & John Taylor. (2003). Church and Chronicle in the Middle Ages: Essays Presented to John Taylor. Medical Entomology and Zoology.11 indexed citations
5.
Wood, Ian N.. (2003). Gregorio de Tours y Clodoveo. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 125–153.1 indexed citations
6.
Pohl, Walter, Ian N. Wood, & Helmut Reimitz. (2001). The transformation of frontiers : from late antiquity to the Carolingians. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association.18 indexed citations
7.
Wood, Ian N.. (2001). The Missionary Life: Saints and the Evangelisation of Europe 400-1050. Medical Entomology and Zoology.38 indexed citations
8.
Wood, Ian N.. (2000). The exchange of gifts among the late antique aristocracy. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 301–314.
9.
Wood, Ian N.. (1998). Franks and Alamanni in the Merovingian period : an ethnographic perspective. Medical Entomology and Zoology.12 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.