Dominic Janes
- History top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Classics top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Walter PohlMayke de JongYitzhak HenMarios CostambeysRob MeensRosamond McKitterickMatthew InnesCatherine Cubitt
- Topics
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (9 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (7 papers)Fashion and Cultural Textiles (6 papers)
- Journals
- AntiquityInnovations in Education and Teaching InternationalAmerican Journal of Legal History
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Dominic Janes
26 papers receiving 88 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- History 54
- Sociology and Political Science 44
- Classics 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 24
- Political Science and International Relations 19
Countries citing papers authored by Dominic Janes
This map shows the geographic impact of Dominic Janes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dominic Janes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dominic Janes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dominic Janes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dominic Janes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dominic Janes. The network helps show where Dominic Janes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dominic Janes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dominic Janes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dominic Janes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dominic Janes. Dominic Janes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | New approaches in history and theology to same-sex love and desire | 1 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Seeing and tasting the divine: Simeon Solomon’s homoerotic sacrament | 0 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | Shopping for Jesus: faith in marketing in the USA | 1 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | Romans and Christians | 2 |
| 19 | 42 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Dominic Janes
Dominic Janes is a scholar working on Museology, History and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 44 papers that have together received 132 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (9 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (7 papers) and Fashion and Cultural Textiles (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (32 citations), History (54 citations) and Museology (11 citations). Dominic Janes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Walter Pohl, Mayke de Jong, Yitzhak Hen, Marios Costambeys, Rob Meens, Rosamond McKitterick, Matthew Innes, Catherine Cubitt, Mary Garrison and Cristina La Rocca. Their work appears in journals such as Antiquity, Innovations in Education and Teaching International and American Journal of Legal History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.