Julia M. H. Smith

1.3k citations
27 papers · 141 indexed · h-index 7
Topics
Medieval Literature and History (14 papers)Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers)Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (5 papers)

In The Last Decade

Julia M. H. Smith

20 papers receiving 90 citations

Peers

Julia M. H. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Classics 91
  • History 81
  • Political Science and International Relations 20
  • Archeology 14
  • Anthropology 12
Replace Elisabeth van Houts with:
Elisabeth van Houts United Kingdom
Yitzhak Hen Israel
Henry Mayr‐Harting United Kingdom
Mayke de Jong Netherlands
Rob Meens Netherlands
Christoph T. Maier Switzerland
Marios Costambeys United Kingdom
Catherine Cubitt United Kingdom
Madeline H. Caviness United States
Helmut Reimitz Germany
Julia M. H. Smith relative to Elisabeth van Houts United Kingdom Elisabeth van Houts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Elisabeth van Houts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia M. H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia M. H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia M. H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia M. H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia M. H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia M. H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia M. H. Smith. The network helps show where Julia M. H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia M. H. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia M. H. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia M. H. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia M. H. Smith. Julia M. H. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 2
3 1
4 3
5
Early medieval christianities, c. 600-c. 1100
0
6 41
7 2
8
"Emending evil ways and praising God's omnipotence": Einhard and the uses of Roman martyrs
6
9
Confronting identities: the rhetoric and reality of a Carolingian frontier
0
10
Thiebaux (Marcelle), éd. and trans. Dhuoda: Handbook for her Warrior Son. Liber Manualis
0
11 8
12 4
13 3
14
The hagiography of Hucbald of Saint-Amand
4
15 1
16 12
17 0
18 7
19 16
20 3

About Julia M. H. Smith

Julia M. H. Smith is a scholar working on Classics, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 141 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (14 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (6 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (91 citations), History (81 citations) and Religious studies (8 citations). Julia M. H. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include John C. Cavadini, John J. Contreni and Thomas F. X. Noble. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Past & Present and Gender & History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026