Mateja Lorber

37 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Mateja Lorber
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Research and Theory 30
  • Leadership and Management 26
  • General Health Professions 188
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 74
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
Replace Nazik Zakari with:
Nazik Zakari Saudi Arabia
Pilar Marqués‐Sánchez Spain
Joanna Burzyńska Poland
Hsing‐Yi Yu Taiwan
Suja Karkada Oman
Seung‐Hye Choi South Korea
Dan Weberg United States
Seok Hee Jeong South Korea
Blake Peck Australia
Mateja Lorber relative to Nazik Zakari Saudi Arabia Nazik Zakari's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Nazik Zakari · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mateja Lorber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mateja Lorber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mateja Lorber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mateja Lorber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mateja Lorber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mateja Lorber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mateja Lorber. The network helps show where Mateja Lorber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mateja Lorber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mateja Lorber Line = papers co-authored together Mateja Lorber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012126
2 201963
3 202046
4 201123
5 202019
6 202016
7 202314
8 201414
9 202311
10 20229
11 20169
12 20238
13 20218
14 20218
15 20228
16 20227
17 20187
18 20236
19 20216
20 20226

About Mateja Lorber

Mateja Lorber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 46 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (7 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (6 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (3 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (30 citations), Leadership and Management (26 citations), General Health Professions (188 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (74 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations). Mateja Lorber has collaborated with scholars based in Slovenia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Brigita Skela‐Savič, Sonja Treven, Gregor Štiglic, Damijan Mumel, Sergej Kmetec, Irena Rogelj, László Varga, Peter Lewis, Sabina Fijan and Tomaž Langerholc. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Journal of Nursing Management, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, International Journal of Older People Nursing and JMIR mhealth and uhealth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact