Mary M. Williams

493 citations
17 papers · 340 indexed · h-index 10

Mary M. Williams

17 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Mary M. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Education 157
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 41
  • Safety Research 20
  • Media Technology 20
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 34
Replace Clinton Smith with:
Clinton Smith United States
Kirsten Doehler United States
Sandra Glover Gagnon United States
Cynthia A. Mervis United States
Hughes Evans United States
Jo Lebeer Belgium
Sanja Franić Netherlands
Jack Kavanagh United States
Mary G. Winkler United States
Din‐yan Yip Hong Kong
Mary M. Williams relative to Clinton Smith United States Clinton Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.7×
Clinton Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary M. Williams. The network helps show where Mary M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Mary M. Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary M. Williams Line = papers co-authored together Mary M. Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Participation in School Sports: Risk or Protective Factor for Drug Use among Black and White Students?.
200619
2 200431
3 20021
4 200120
5
Educating Hearts and Minds: A Comprehensive Character Education Framework. Second Edition.
20015
6
Character Education: A Guide For School Administrators
20019
7 200046
8 200010
9 19998
10 19993
11 19976
12
Educating Hearts and Minds: A Comprehensive Character Education Framework
199748
13 19947
14 199464
15
Actions Speak Louder than Words: What Students Think.
199327
16
You Can Curtail Tattling.
19894
17 195732

About Mary M. Williams

Mary M. Williams is a scholar working on Education, Language and Linguistics and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 17 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Values and Moral Education (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Calibration and Measurement Techniques (2 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (2 papers), Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods (2 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (2 papers), Education and Character Development (2 papers) and Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Education (157 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (41 citations) and Safety Research (20 citations). Mary M. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison Watson, William S. McEwan, Ronald A. Henry, Henry H. Mangurten, Paula P. Meier, Janet L. Engstrom, Marvin P. Dawkins, Edwin M. Winter, J.H. Parish and Eric Moskowitz Schaps. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Educational leadership and The Journal of Negro Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026