Mary Law

25.6k citations
272 papers · 18.9k indexed · 4 hit papers · h-index 74

Impact in

Papers in

Mary Law

263 papers receiving 17.4k citations

Hit Papers

Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare 2014 · 345 citations
3451990202620022014250500750

Peers

Mary Law
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
  • Occupational Therapy 5.1k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 10.4k
  • Clinical Psychology 8.5k
  • Rehabilitation 1.8k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 4.7k
Replace Gillian King with:
Gillian King Canada
Jenny Ziviani Australia
Alarcos Cieza Germany
Wendy J. Coster United States
Helene J. Polatajko Canada
Sylvia Rodger Australia
Marjolijn Ketelaar Netherlands
Nenad Kostanjsek Switzerland
Allen W. Heinemann United States
Marcel W. M. Post Netherlands
Mary Law relative to Gillian King Canada Gillian King's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Gillian King · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Law

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Law more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Law

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Law. The network helps show where Mary Law may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary Law, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Law Line = papers co-authored together Mary Law links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20210
2 201879
3 20165
4 201560
5 201546
6 201523
7 201446
8 201414
9 201447
10 201212
11 201149
12 201199
13 200934
14 2008221
15 2007148
16 2006393
17 2006322
18 20036
19
Client centered occupational therapy
1998136
20 1991149

About Mary Law

Mary Law is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 272 papers that have together received 18.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (148 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (133 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (86 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (49 papers), Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport (29 papers), Youth Development and Social Support (17 papers), Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (16 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (5.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (10.4k citations), Clinical Psychology (8.5k citations), Rehabilitation (1.8k citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (4.7k citations). Mary Law has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Peter Rosenbaum, Gillian King, Nancy Pollock, Susanne King, Sue Baptiste, Debra Stewart, Lori Letts, Helene J. Polatajko, Patricia A. Hurley and Dana Anaby. Their work appears in journals such as Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, American Journal of Occupational Therapy and Child Care Health and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026