Mary Delaney

22 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Mary Delaney
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Genetics 105
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • General Health Professions 76
  • Social Psychology 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 57
Replace Jennifer Murphy with:
Jennifer Murphy United States
Gretchen M. Reevy United States
Valerie Maholmes United States
Chuck W. Peek United States
Amanda M. Richer United States
Janine Muldoon United Kingdom
Phyllis Erdman United States
Nancy L. Worsham United States
Elsie R. Shore United States
Polly Yeung New Zealand
Mary Delaney relative to Jennifer Murphy United States Jennifer Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jennifer Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Delaney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Delaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Delaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Delaney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Delaney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Delaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Delaney. The network helps show where Mary Delaney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Delaney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Delaney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Delaney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Delaney. Mary Delaney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Delivering Library Services in a time of crisis; Technological Higher Education Association Libraries responding to COVID-19 from March – August 2020
3
2 1
3 2
4 0
5
Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Irish Academic Libraries: Stories of Professional Artistry
2
6 9
7
Attitudes of the public towards policies to address obesity
4
8 8
9 12
10 23
11 21
12 16
13 20
14 14
15 11
16 24
17 27
18 44
19
Who will pay for retiree health care?
3
20 3

About Mary Delaney

Mary Delaney is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Pharmacy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 354 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (4 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (31 citations), Clinical Psychology (89 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (55 citations). Mary Delaney has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Dan Lago, Donald B. Langille, Cathleen M Connell, Pantelis Andreou, Daphne Lordly, Jasna Jovanović, Richard M. Lerner, Alexander von Eye, Susan M. Brigham and Alex B. Siegling. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality Assessment, The Journal of Early Adolescence and International Journal of Qualitative Methods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026