Martha M. Eining

439 citations
12 papers · 326 indexed · h-index 7

Martha M. Eining

10 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Martha M. Eining
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Accounting 200
  • General Decision Sciences 29
  • Information Systems and Management 71
  • Safety Research 39
  • Marketing 36
Replace Eugene G. Chewning with:
Eugene G. Chewning United States
Buck K. W. Pei United States
R. Glen Berryman United States
H. Scott Asay United States
C. Janie Chang United States
Andrew J. Rosman United States
Richard M. Tubbs United States
Tim Bauer United States
O. Ray Whittington United States
Marcus M. Doxey United States
Martha M. Eining relative to Eugene G. Chewning United States Eugene G. Chewning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Eugene G. Chewning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Martha M. Eining

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Martha M. Eining's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martha M. Eining with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martha M. Eining more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Martha M. Eining

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martha M. Eining. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martha M. Eining. The network helps show where Martha M. Eining may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Martha M. Eining, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Martha M. Eining Line = papers co-authored together Martha M. Eining links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 20209
2 20120
3 201120
4 200940
5 200814
6 20084
7 200838
8 200645
9
Rebirth of Accounting Information Systems Curricula
19992
10
Reliance on Decision Aids: An Examination of Auditors' Assessment of Management Fraud
1997151
11 19941
12
The impact of an expert system as a decision aid on learning during the audit process : an empirical test
19872

About Martha M. Eining

Martha M. Eining is a scholar working on Accounting, General Decision Sciences, Management Information Systems, Pharmacy and Information Systems and Management, having authored 12 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (6 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 papers), Financial Reporting and XBRL (2 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (1 paper), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (1 paper) and Water Quality and Resources Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (200 citations), General Decision Sciences (29 citations), Information Systems and Management (71 citations), Safety Research (39 citations) and Marketing (36 citations). Martha M. Eining has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Arab Emirates. Frequent co-authors include Donald R. Jones, James K. Loebbecke, Rick C. Warne, Paul Jen‐Hwa Hu, David N. Hurtt, James E. Rebele, Marlene Plumlee, Patrick E. Hopkins, Christine A. Botosan and Philip M.J. Reckers. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Information Systems, Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory, Contemporary Accounting Research, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Accounting Horizons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026