Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effective Schools: A Review
19831.0k citationsStewart C. Purkey, Marshall S. Smithprofile →
Countries citing papers authored by Marshall S. Smith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Marshall S. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marshall S. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marshall S. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marshall S. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marshall S. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marshall S. Smith. The network helps show where Marshall S. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marshall S. Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marshall S. Smith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marshall S. Smith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marshall S. Smith. Marshall S. Smith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Marshall S., et al.. (2007). The infrastructure of open educational resources. Educational Technology archive. 47(6). 10–14.6 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Marshall S., et al.. (2002). The Expert Panel's Framework for Assessing the Quality of Educational Technology Programs.. Educational Technology archive. 42(3). 33–36.1 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Marshall S., et al.. (2002). We can work it out: Early lessons from the development of LSPs in England. UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol).1 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Marshall S., et al.. (1995). The Clinton Human Capital Agenda. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 96(3). 1–16.20 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Marshall S. & Jennifer A. O’Day. (1993). School Reform and Equal Opportunity: An Introduction to the Education Symposium. 4. 15.2 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Marshall S.. (1992). State Policy and Systemic School Reform.. Educational Technology archive. 32(11). 31–36.5 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Marshall S.. (1991). A National Curriculum in the United States. Educational leadership. 49(1). 74–81.10 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Marshall S.. (1990). National Curriculum, American Style: Can It Be Done? What Might It Look Like?.. 14(4).6 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Marshall S., et al.. (1985). Indicators of Educational Quality.. Educational leadership. 43(2). 21–24.7 indexed citations
Purkey, Stewart C. & Marshall S. Smith. (1983). School Reform: The Policy Implications of the Effective Schools Literature..4 indexed citations
16.
Purkey, Stewart C. & Marshall S. Smith. (1982). Too Soon to Cheer? Synthesis of Research on Effective Schools.. Educational leadership. 40(3). 64–69.84 indexed citations
17.
Purkey, Stewart C. & Marshall S. Smith. (1982). Highlights from Research on Effective Schools.. Educational leadership. 40(3). 67.3 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Marshall S.. (1973). Some Short Term Effects of Project Head Start: A Preliminary Report on the Second Year of Planned Variation--1970-71..7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.