Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Digital platform ecosystems
2019419 citationsAndreas Hein, Maximilian Schreieck et al.Electronic Marketsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Markus Böhm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Markus Böhm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Markus Böhm more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Markus Böhm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Markus Böhm. The network helps show where Markus Böhm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Markus Böhm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Markus Böhm.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Markus Böhm based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Markus Böhm. Markus Böhm is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bauer, Florian, et al.. (2021). Why Incumbents Should Care–The Repercussions of FinTechs on Incumbent Banks. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
5.
Hermes, Sebastian, et al.. (2021). CHALLENGES AND SUCCESS POTENTIALS OF PLATFORM COOPERATIVES: INSIGHTS FROM A MULTIPLE CASE STUDY. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
Weber, Michael, et al.. (2021). AI Startup Business Models. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 64(1). 91–109.45 indexed citations
8.
Hermes, Sebastian, et al.. (2020). BREEDING GROUNDS OF DIGITAL PLATFORMS: EXPLORING THE SOURCES OF AMERICAN PLATFORM DOMINATION, CHINA’S PLATFORM SELF-SUFFICIENCY, AND EUROPE’S PLATFORM GAP. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.5 indexed citations
9.
Hermes, Sebastian, et al.. (2020). Digital Platforms and Market Dominance: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review and Avenues for Future Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 42.8 indexed citations
Weking, Jörg, et al.. (2019). IoT as PSS Enabler: Exploring Opportunities for Conceptualization and Implementation.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 133.3 indexed citations
12.
Riasanow, Tobias, et al.. (2018). The Generic Blockchain Ecosystem and its Strategic Implications. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.18 indexed citations
13.
Weking, Jörg, et al.. (2018). Business Model Innovation Strategies for Product Service Systems – An Explorative Study in the Manufacturing Industry. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.12 indexed citations
14.
Weking, Jörg, et al.. (2018). Archetypes for Industry 4.0 Business Model Innovations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.25 indexed citations
15.
Böhm, Markus, et al.. (2017). The Business Model DNA: Towards an Approach for Predicting Business Model Success. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1006–1020.14 indexed citations
16.
Böhm, Markus, et al.. (2017). Disruption of Individual Mobility Ahead? A Longitudinal Study of Risk and Benefit Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars on Twitter. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.14 indexed citations
17.
Böhm, Markus, et al.. (2015). Analyse der Eignung domänenspezifischer Methoden der Anforderungsverfolgung für Produkt-Service-Systeme. WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK. 210–224.4 indexed citations
18.
Leimeister, Jan Marco, et al.. (2012). Managing IT in a Business Unit Divestiture. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11(1). 37–48.4 indexed citations
19.
Böhm, Markus, et al.. (2010). Managing the IT Carve-Out in a SBU Divestment. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 132.7 indexed citations
20.
Böhm, Markus, et al.. (2010). IT CHALLENGES IN M&A TRANSACTIONS – THE IT CARVE-OUT VIEW ON DIVESTMENTS. SSRN Electronic Journal. 105.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.