Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
International students: a vulnerable student population
2009422 citationsMark Sherry, Peter Thomas et al.Higher Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sherry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sherry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sherry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sherry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sherry. The network helps show where Mark Sherry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Sherry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Sherry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Sherry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Sherry. Mark Sherry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sherry, Mark. (2002). Welfare reform and disability policy in Australia. 3.6 indexed citations
13.
Sherry, Mark. (2000). Hate crimes against disabled people. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).7 indexed citations
14.
Sherry, Mark. (1999). What's wrong with the medical model of disability?. interactions. 12(4). 19–21.1 indexed citations
15.
Sherry, Mark. (1999). Hate crimes against people with disabilities. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland).3 indexed citations
16.
Sherry, Mark. (1999). The politics of disablement: A comparison of the medical and social models of disability. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 729–740.
17.
Sherry, Mark. (1992). Integrated learning systems: what may we expect in the future?. Educational Technology archive. 32(9). 58–59.4 indexed citations
18.
Sherry, Mark. (1992). Searching for New American Schools. Phi Delta Kappan. 74(4). 299–302.
Sherry, Mark. (1990). An EPIC Institute report: integrated instructional systems. T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education. 18(2). 86–89.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.