Robert Stalnaker
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 22
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.05%
- Philosophy and History of Science 6
- Philosophy, Science, and History 5
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 28
- Language and Linguistics top 0.2%
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 13
-
- Game Theory and Applications 5
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 4
Robert Stalnaker
84 papers receiving 4.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Philosophy 2.3k
- History and Philosophy of Science 860
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.5k
- Language and Linguistics 1.4k
- General Decision Sciences 119
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Stalnaker
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Stalnaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Stalnaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Stalnaker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Stalnaker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Stalnaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Stalnaker. The network helps show where Robert Stalnaker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert Stalnaker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 14 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 27 | |
| 5 | Sens et contexte | 2011 | 0 |
| 6 | 2008 | 174 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 107 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 13 | |
| 9 | On Considering a Possible World as Actual | 2001 | 37 |
| 10 | 1999 | 140 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 13 | Conditionals as random variables | 1994 | 30 |
| 14 | Notes on conditional semantics | 1992 | 6 |
| 15 | Semantics for conditionals | 1990 | 2 |
| 16 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1987 | 24 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 38 | |
| 19 | Pragmatics: Implicative, presupposition, and logical form. By Gerald Gazdar. New York: Academic Press, 1979. Pp. xv, 186. $13.50.breakdown → | 1980 | 477 |
| 20 | 1979 | 20 |
About Robert Stalnaker
Robert Stalnaker is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 88 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (28 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (22 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (13 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Game Theory and Applications (5 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (5 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (2.3k citations), History and Philosophy of Science (860 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.5k citations), Language and Linguistics (1.4k citations) and General Decision Sciences (119 citations). Robert Stalnaker has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ned Block, Richmond H. Thomason, Edward L. Keenan, Lauri Karttunen, William Harper, Glenn Pearce, Frank Jackson, Hilary Putnam, Thomas Baldwin and Richard C. Jeffrey. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Synthese, Theoria and The Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.