Midwest Studies in Philosophy

822 papers and 10.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 822 papers published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 10.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy usually cover Philosophy (205 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (91 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (83 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (70 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (63 papers) and Free Will and Agency (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Midwest Studies in Philosophy are Tyler Burge, Saul A. Kripke, Margaret Gilbert, Laurence Bonjour, Ned Block, Jaegwon Kim, Peter Unger, Kirk Ludwig, Kit Fine and Peter van Inwagen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Midwest Studies in Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Midwest Studies in Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Midwest Studies in Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025