Mark Crimmins

1.2k total citations
16 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

Mark Crimmins is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Crimmins has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 5 papers in Philosophy and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Mark Crimmins's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers). Mark Crimmins is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers). Mark Crimmins collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark Crimmins's co-authors include John L. Perry, François Récanati, Steven E. Boër, Mark Richard and Peter Ludlow and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and The Philosophical Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Mark Crimmins

13 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Crimmins United States	8	323	269	98	84	77	16	449
John Oliver Perry	1	293 0.9×	232 0.9×	121 1.2×	71 0.8×	148 1.9×	3	407
Joseph Almog	2	293 0.9×	233 0.9×	121 1.2×	71 0.8×	148 1.9×	2	408
Michael Glanzberg United States	11	306 0.9×	246 0.9×	134 1.4×	84 1.0×	96 1.2×	25	424
Dilip Ninan United States	10	226 0.7×	214 0.8×	99 1.0×	55 0.7×	116 1.5×	22	366
Ofra Magidor United Kingdom	12	262 0.8×	240 0.9×	71 0.7×	96 1.1×	70 0.9×	28	373
Josh Dever United States	10	174 0.5×	161 0.6×	73 0.7×	56 0.7×	46 0.6×	20	288
Anthony Everett United Kingdom	7	267 0.8×	205 0.8×	38 0.4×	121 1.4×	26 0.3×	15	330
Peter Hanks United States	9	247 0.8×	209 0.8×	66 0.7×	83 1.0×	54 0.7×	17	323
Romane Clark United States	8	108 0.3×	100 0.4×	42 0.4×	34 0.4×	34 0.4×	24	232
Isidora Stojanovic France	8	143 0.4×	160 0.6×	43 0.4×	20 0.2×	82 1.1×	23	250

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Crimmins

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Crimmins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Crimmins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Crimmins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Crimmins

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Crimmins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Crimmins. The network helps show where Mark Crimmins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Crimmins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Crimmins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Crimmins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Crimmins. Mark Crimmins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Crimmins, Mark. (2002). Thing Talk Moonlighting. Philosophical Studies. 108(1-2). 83–98. 2 indexed citations

2.

Crimmins, Mark. (1998). Hesperus and Phosphorus: Sense, Pretense, and Reference. The Philosophical Review. 107(1). 1–1. 56 indexed citations

3.

Crimmins, Mark. (1996). Philosophy of Language. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 2 indexed citations

4.

Crimmins, Mark. (1995). Notional Specificity. Mind & Language. 10(4). 464–477. 5 indexed citations

5.

Récanati, François & Mark Crimmins. (1995). Quasi-Singular Propositions: The Semantics of Belief Reports. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume. 69(1). 175–210. 9 indexed citations

6.

Crimmins, Mark. (1995). Contextuality, Reflexivity, Iteration, Logic. Philosophical Perspectives. 9. 381–381. 8 indexed citations

7.

Ludlow, Peter & Mark Crimmins. (1995). Talk About Beliefs.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 45(178). 131–131.

8.

Boër, Steven E. & Mark Crimmins. (1994). Talk About Beliefs.. The Philosophical Review. 103(2). 358–358. 2 indexed citations

9.

Crimmins, Mark. (1993). So-labeled neo-Fregeanism. Philosophical Studies. 69(2-3). 265–279. 2 indexed citations

10.

Crimmins, Mark. (1992). Tacitness and Virtual Beliefs. Mind & Language. 7(3). 240–263. 20 indexed citations

11.

Crimmins, Mark. (1992). Talk about beliefs. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 136 indexed citations

12.

Crimmins, Mark. (1992). Context in the attitudes. Linguistics and Philosophy. 15(2). 185–198. 23 indexed citations

13.

Crimmins, Mark & Mark Richard. (1992). Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them.. The Philosophical Review. 101(4). 895–895. 1 indexed citations

14.

Crimmins, Mark. (1992). I Falsely Believe That P. Analysis. 52(3). 191–191. 1 indexed citations

15.

Crimmins, Mark. (1989). Having Ideas and Having the Concept. Mind & Language. 4(4). 280–294. 11 indexed citations

16.

Crimmins, Mark & John L. Perry. (1989). The Prince and the Phone Booth: Reporting Puzzling Beliefs. The Journal of Philosophy. 86(12). 685–685. 171 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact