Mark K. Warford

487 total citations
13 papers, 252 citations indexed

About

Mark K. Warford is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark K. Warford has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 252 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Language and Linguistics, 4 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Mark K. Warford's work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers). Mark K. Warford is often cited by papers focused on EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (6 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (3 papers). Mark K. Warford collaborates with scholars based in United States and Russia. Mark K. Warford's co-authors include Jenelle Reeves, William L. White and Alexander M. Sidorkin and has published in prestigious journals such as Teaching and Teacher Education, Teachers and Teaching and Foreign Language Annals.

In The Last Decade

Mark K. Warford

11 papers receiving 210 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark K. Warford United States 6 158 86 65 54 33 13 252
Simon Gieve United Kingdom 5 175 1.1× 135 1.6× 115 1.8× 45 0.8× 54 1.6× 8 308
J. Kullman United Kingdom 6 131 0.8× 137 1.6× 105 1.6× 27 0.5× 71 2.2× 7 293
Sal Consoli United Kingdom 8 95 0.6× 100 1.2× 75 1.2× 27 0.5× 10 0.3× 21 234
Sue Dymoke United Kingdom 11 276 1.7× 47 0.5× 144 2.2× 47 0.9× 14 0.4× 21 391
Sibel Tatar Türkiye 6 167 1.1× 102 1.2× 75 1.2× 24 0.4× 38 1.2× 12 267
Dan Madigan United States 5 182 1.2× 45 0.5× 107 1.6× 61 1.1× 8 0.2× 11 280
Indika Liyanage Australia 11 167 1.1× 158 1.8× 145 2.2× 72 1.3× 13 0.4× 43 341
Robert P. Yagelski United States 11 169 1.1× 65 0.8× 140 2.2× 53 1.0× 15 0.5× 26 277
Graham Parr Australia 13 334 2.1× 64 0.7× 140 2.2× 26 0.5× 36 1.1× 55 430
Katherine Richardson Bruna United States 10 207 1.3× 55 0.6× 82 1.3× 69 1.3× 6 0.2× 29 307

Countries citing papers authored by Mark K. Warford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark K. Warford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark K. Warford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark K. Warford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark K. Warford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark K. Warford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark K. Warford. The network helps show where Mark K. Warford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark K. Warford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark K. Warford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark K. Warford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark K. Warford. Mark K. Warford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Sidorkin, Alexander M. & Mark K. Warford. (2017). Reforms and Innovation in Education. 5 indexed citations
2.
Warford, Mark K.. (2014). Toward a Framework for Evaluating Online Instruction in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems. 42(4). 333–353. 2 indexed citations
3.
Warford, Mark K., et al.. (2013). Overcoming resistance to 90% target language use: Rationale, challenges, and suggestions. 5 indexed citations
4.
Warford, Mark K. & William L. White. (2012). Reconnecting Proficiency, Literacy, and Culture: From Theory to Practice. Foreign Language Annals. 45(3). 400–414. 9 indexed citations
5.
Warford, Mark K.. (2011). Narrative Language Pedagogy and the Stabilization of Indigenous Languages.. ˜The œreading matrix. 11(1). 76–88. 1 indexed citations
6.
Warford, Mark K.. (2010). The zone of proximal teacher development. Teaching and Teacher Education. 27(2). 252–258. 125 indexed citations
7.
Warford, Mark K.. (2010). ¿Enseñar gramática y cultura en la lengua extranjera? Empezando en las zonas de mayor resistencia. Hispania. 93(2). 292–304. 2 indexed citations
8.
Warford, Mark K.. (2006). Assessing Target Cultural Literacy: The Buffalo State Experience. ADFL Bulletin. 47–57. 3 indexed citations
9.
Warford, Mark K., et al.. (2005). Relatos de experiencias propias como estrategia en la enseñanza-aprendizaje de una segunda lengua. Hispania. 88(1). 172–172. 1 indexed citations
10.
Warford, Mark K. & Jenelle Reeves. (2003). Falling into it: Novice TESOL teacher thinking. Teachers and Teaching. 9(1). 47–65. 47 indexed citations
11.
Warford, Mark K.. (2003). The FL Methods Course: Where It's Been; Where It's Headed.. 2 indexed citations
12.
Warford, Mark K., et al.. (2000). Issues of adjustment to higher education: International students' perspectives. 30(1). 17–35. 49 indexed citations
13.
Warford, Mark K.. (1996). Witness : twenty-five years on the environmental front line. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026