Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage
2004627 citationsStephen Tallman, Mark Jenkins et al.Academy of Management Reviewprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Jenkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Jenkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Jenkins more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Jenkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Jenkins. The network helps show where Mark Jenkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Jenkins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Jenkins.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Jenkins based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Jenkins. Mark Jenkins is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wilcox, Mark & Mark Jenkins. (2015). Engaging Change: A People-Centred Approach to Business Transformation. CERN Bulletin.
5.
Svinarich, J. Thomas, Dan Dan, Charan Kantipudi, et al.. (2014). Comparison of resource utilization of pulmonary vein isolation: cryoablation versus RF ablation with three-dimensional mapping in the Value PVI Study.. PubMed. 26(6). 268–72.15 indexed citations
Tallman, Stephen, Mark Jenkins, Nick Henry, & Steven Pinch. (2004). Knowledge, Clusters, and Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review. 29(2). 258–271.627 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Jenkins, Mark & Véronique Ambrosini. (2002). Strategic Management: A Multi-Perspective Approach.13 indexed citations
15.
Jenkins, Mark. (1998). Spinning your wheels or winning the race:knowledge, resources and advantage in formula one racing. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).
Jenkins, Mark. (1994). A methodology for creating and comparing strategic causal maps. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).5 indexed citations
18.
Jenkins, Mark, et al.. (1990). Focus Groups: A Discussion. British Food Journal. 92(9). 33–37.17 indexed citations
19.
Jenkins, Mark & G. E. R. Lloyd. (1985). How corporate philosophy and strategy shape the use of HR information systems.. PubMed. 62(5). 28–38.13 indexed citations
20.
Jenkins, Mark. (1979). Bevanism: Labour's High Tide: The Cold War and the Democratic Mass Movement. Medical Entomology and Zoology.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.