Mark J. Twery

2.1k citations
48 papers · 853 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark J. Twery

44 papers receiving 754 citations

Peers

Mark J. Twery
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 456
  • Global and Planetary Change 442
  • Insect Science 163
  • Ecological Modeling 35
  • Ecology 203
Replace Paul C. Rogers with:
Paul C. Rogers United States
Peter J. Gould United States
David L. Loftis United States
Niels Brouwers Australia
Ugo Chiavetta Italy
William A. Bechtold United States
Melinda Moeur United States
Fabrizio Cartenì Italy
Joachim Saborowski Germany
John M. Pye United States
Mark J. Twery relative to Paul C. Rogers United States Paul C. Rogers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Paul C. Rogers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Twery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Twery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Twery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Twery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Twery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Twery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Twery. The network helps show where Mark J. Twery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark J. Twery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark J. Twery Line = papers co-authored together Mark J. Twery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006236
2 198480
3 200852
4 200049
5 200547
6 200838
7 200330
8 200029
9 199828
10 200023
11 199321
12
Effects of defoliation by gypsy moth
199120
13 200018
14 200018
15 198717
16 199016
17 201314
18 200011
19 200110
20 201510

About Mark J. Twery

Mark J. Twery is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (16 papers), Forest Management and Policy (15 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (6 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (3 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (456 citations), Global and Planetary Change (442 citations), Insect Science (163 citations), Ecological Modeling (35 citations) and Ecology (203 citations). Mark J. Twery has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Papaik, María Uriarte, Charles D. Canham, Jennifer C. Jenkins, William H. McWilliams, H. Michael Rauscher, William S. Keeton, Rose‐Marie Muzika, David L. Loftis and Donald Nute. Their work appears in journals such as Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Agricultural and Forest Entomology and Journal of Forestry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact