Charles D. Canham
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 0.01%
- Global and Planetary Change top 0.05%
- Ecology top 0.1%
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.1%
- Co-authors
- Stephen W. PacalaAdrien C. FinziJohn A. SilanderRichard K. KobeRichard S. OstfeldN. van BreemenMaría UriarteK Dave Coates
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (113 papers)Forest ecology and management (40 papers)Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Charles D. Canham
156 papers receiving 16.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 13.0k
- Global and Planetary Change 8.6k
- Ecology 5.3k
- Plant Science 3.4k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 3.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Charles D. Canham
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles D. Canham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles D. Canham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles D. Canham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles D. Canham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles D. Canham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles D. Canham. The network helps show where Charles D. Canham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles D. Canham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles D. Canham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles D. Canham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles D. Canham. Charles D. Canham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 73 | |
| 4 | 41 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | Sampling forest regeneration across northern U.S. forests: filling a void in regeneration model input | 0 |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 234 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 389 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 85 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 96 | |
| 17 | 132 | |
| 18 | 261 | |
| 19 | 218 | |
| 20 | The roles of small rodents in creating patchy environments | 11 |
About Charles D. Canham
Charles D. Canham is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Ecological Modeling, having authored 158 papers that have together received 18.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (113 papers), Forest ecology and management (40 papers) and Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (13.0k citations), Global and Planetary Change (8.6k citations) and Ecological Modeling (1.0k citations). Charles D. Canham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Stephen W. Pacala, Adrien C. Finzi, John A. Silander, Richard K. Kobe, Richard S. Ostfeld, N. van Breemen, María Uriarte, K Dave Coates, Kathleen C. Weathers and Patrick H. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, PLoS ONE and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.