Countries citing papers authored by Kurt W. Gottschalk
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kurt W. Gottschalk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kurt W. Gottschalk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kurt W. Gottschalk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kurt W. Gottschalk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kurt W. Gottschalk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kurt W. Gottschalk. The network helps show where Kurt W. Gottschalk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kurt W. Gottschalk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kurt W. Gottschalk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kurt W. Gottschalk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Kurt W. Gottschalk. Kurt W. Gottschalk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Miller, Gary W., Thomas M. Schuler, Kurt W. Gottschalk, et al.. (2013). Proceedings, 18th Central Hardwood Forest Conference. 117. 1–531.11 indexed citations
4.
Gottschalk, Kurt W., et al.. (2013). Proceedings, 23rd U.S. Department of Agriculture interagency research forum on invasive species 2012. 114. 1–126.3 indexed citations
Schweitzer, Callie J., et al.. (2011). USING SILVICULTURE TO SUSTAIN UPLAND OAK FORESTS UNDER STRESS ON THE DANIEL BOONE NATIONAL FOREST, KENTUCKY. 78. 476–489.1 indexed citations
7.
Balcì, Y., et al.. (2008). Pathogenicity of Phytophthora species isolated from rhizosphere soil in the eastern United States. 214.1 indexed citations
Eisenbies, Mark H., et al.. (2007). Tree Mortality in Mixed Pine-Hardwood Stands Defoliated by the European Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar L.). Forest Science. 53(6). 683–691.17 indexed citations
11.
McWilliams, William H., Todd W. Bowersox, Patrick H. Brose, et al.. (2004). Indicators of regenerative capacity for eastern hardwood forests.1 indexed citations
Liebhold, Andrew M., et al.. (1997). Gypsy moth in the United States: An atlas. Forest Service general technical report (Final). OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).5 indexed citations
14.
Gottschalk, Kurt W.. (1995). Using silviculture to improve health in northeastern conifer and eastern hardwood forests. 267(1). 104–10.11 indexed citations
15.
Liebhold, Andrew M., Kurt W. Gottschalk, Rose‐Marie Muzika, Michael E. Montgomery, & Reginald Young. (1995). Suitability of north American tree species to the gypsy moth: A summary of field and laboratory tests. Forest Service general technical report (Final). OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).48 indexed citations
Gottschalk, Kurt W., et al.. (1994). Using silviculture to increase forest health: a national forest/research/state and private demonstration area. 132–136.
Dickmann, Donald I., et al.. (1985). Determining photosynthesis of tree leaves in the field using a portable carbon 14 carbon dioxide apparatus procedures and problems. Photosynthetica. 19(1). 98–108.18 indexed citations
20.
Nelson, Neil D., Donald I. Dickmann, & Kurt W. Gottschalk. (1982). Autumnal photosynthesis in short-rotation intensively cultured Populus clones. Photosynthetica. 16(3). 321–333.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.